Hi Med,
On 1/17/2023 2:46 PM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
If we want to add an IANA link to update RFC 8407, Section 3.9, a
couple of remarks:
- It's not clear what "a normative reference with the IANA URL" is.
Is it
https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml?
Or is it
https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/iana-if-t...@2022-08-24.yang?
The more precise the later, right?
*//*
*/[Med] None of them. IANA is using dedicated URLs:/*
*/*
https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-bgp-l2-encaps/iana-bgp-l2-encaps.xhtml/*
*/*
https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-pseudowire-types/iana-pseudowire-types.xhtml/*
*/* https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-bfd-types/iana-bfd-types.xhtml/*
That would work.
We would need
- to get the guarantee (from IANA) that those URLs are permanent
- to clearly mention that THIS URL type is required for IETF YANG
modules
Regards, Benoit
*//*
However, the latter, which is a typical example of IANA maintained
YANG module does NOT work, as the revision in the URL changes with any
IAN update
- So this leads to have both RFC and IANA, so
https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml>+
RFC7224 (in the above example)
- Also, we should make more generic for some other SDOs, as IANA is
for IETF only.
And the guidelines are followed by others: BBF, IEEE, etc.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
