> On Jan 13, 2023, at 11:25 AM, Benoit Claise
> <benoit.claise=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>> Yes I do think that people outside the IETF may be ignorant of the nuances
>> of the way the IETF works and may not realise that a URL to the IANA
>> website must be used in preference to an RFC. There is more to YANG modules
>> than extracting the code from somewhere in order to incorporate it into
>> something. I have even seen RFC reference the obsolete list of
>> possibilities in the RFC that set up an IANA registry
> If this is the case (And Randy supports this), then we should update RFC 8047.
Agreed - as a hold for document update?
Currently RFC 8407, Section 3.9 says:
For every import or include statement that appears in a module
contained in the specification that identifies a module in a separate
document, a corresponding normative reference to that document MUST
appear in the Normative References section. The reference MUST
correspond to the specific module version actually used within the
specification.
Want to take a swing at it?
K.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
