In article <501ceafb6eba...@e-allen.me.uk>, Barry E Allen <ba...@e-allen.me.uk> wrote: > In article <501ce66c00li...@torrens.org.uk>, Torrens (lists) > <li...@torrens.org.uk> wrote: > > http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14177/css/14177_35.htm
> > has bad text overlap problems. It's a pigs-ear of an html, using lots > > of text position information in the css! I suspect if NS can work > > that it can work miracles! > I have similar problems with my TalkTalk bill which all comes out on > one line. > see:- > http://www.bparkfc.plus.com/allen/talktalkbill.html Both pages are specifying text positions. But surely Talktalk pay no heed to standards? How many errors do their pages return from the w3c validator? I recently joined Zen - because they are much recommended. However their pages do not validate and cannot be used on RISC OS. When I pointed this out to them their attitide was that Microsoft returned 300 odd errors, so the validation was useless. Their service is too expensive for support that cannot be used! I looked around a bit. Plus.net's pages validate with very few errors. I am in process of swapping to them - I have yet to find anything on Plus.net that doesn't work properly with Netsurf! Support is via the www site - but it works, and does get actioned. RISC OS users would save themselves trouble by using ISPs that took notice of standards! -- Richard Torrens. http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats and more!
