On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:52 +0100, A W wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, John-Mark Bell > <j...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 00:08 +0100, aw29...@gmail.com wrote: > >> In message <1253105573.5804.236.ca...@duiker> > >> John-Mark Bell <j...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote: > > > In practice, this means that I'll be focussing on the core engine. The > > RISC OS frontend loses out and does not receive the minimal maintenance > > it has had for the last 2.5 years. > > > > > Why, is it more enjoyable?
I don't understand this line of questioning. For NetSurf to be more useful generally, it requires much work to be carried out on the core engine. Improvements to the core engine benefit every platform on which NetSurf is available. Therefore, it should be blatently obvious that, if I have less time available for NetSurf development, then the time I do have should be spent on the core, as it gives maximum return for the investment made. John.
