In message <019bfbbe54.andrew-...@waitrose.com> on 5 May 2015 Andrew Pinder <andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org> > on 5 May 2015 Vincent Sanders <vi...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote: >> Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the >> disc cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if >> suitably interested users could try test CI build 2771 or later. [snip] >> I have also adjusted how the computation of low bandwidth is made to >> try and make it more stable and less "trigger happy". >> I would be interested in getting the details from using the updated >> test release in the same way as previously detailed. (The overall >> bandwidth message from the log) >> I am especially interested in testing from the Iyonix as this was >> right on the edge of usefulness previously. It is probably not worth >> bothering with the RPi and ARM mini platforms as their reported >> bandwidth last time was awful and I do not envisage an improvement of >> that many orders of magnitude. > As you expected, no benefit for ARMini users: > ARMini with RO 5.20 (10 June 2013) and !Boot on the SD card, not the > USB drive. NS #2771 > There was no complaint about the bandwidth being too low but the > reported average from going only to the www.buxtonweather.co.uk site > was 27269 bytes/second. The previous figure I reported was 33092 > bytes/second (NS#2697). I wonder how stable the measurements are. I've just upgraded this ARMini to RO 5.22 so have redone the measurements, still with NS#2771: 161126 bytes/second. That's a massive increase. I had visited a number of websites for that. Trying going to just www.buxtonweather.co.uk (my homepage) as before now gives 154588 bytes/second - only 4% different. Have I missed something, or have ROOL done something spectacular in the changes from 5.20 to 5.22? Regards Andrew -- Andrew Pinder
