On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:34:54 +0800
Kacheong Poon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Hunter wrote:
>
> > So the fact many browsers support 3 on OUR platform wouldn't make it
>
>
> I have no data to determine if the above is true or not. But
> Firefox does not use GConf currently.
Ah, I had this backwards. Getting this right makes the rest of the conversation
make more sense. I believe Calum said that most gnome applications use gconf.
Is modifying important point applications like firefox for our platform that
difficult? Calum idea of doing it via plugin seems less klugy if doable.
FWIW it was easy to get mozilla 1.7 on my desktop to use the system specified
proxy and then point that at a pac file in my home directory. I then munge
that based on whether I'm VPN'd or not.
>
>
> > worthwhile to give the user a mechanism to propagate his wpad/bonjour
> > inputs into the gnome configuration space[1]? But it would be worthwhile to
> > hack up the wpad response even if just for the browser as you suggest
> > in another thread????
>
>
> I guess there is a misunderstanding. We know the solution if
> an app uses GConf key, just make NWAM change it according to
> the Environment.
Sorry, my misunderstanding.
mph
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
