> I don't see how the same underlying interface could be broadcast-type > as far as IPv4 is concerned, but point-to-point for IPv6, or > vice-versa, so putting it on the phyint makes more sense to me.
Can't the same be said of the existing ILLF_MULTICAST flag? Or are we concerned about a hypothetical future IP version that doesn't support multicast, like IPv6 and broadcast? (And speaking of broadcast, shouldn't that be ILLF_BROADCAST rather than IPIF_BROADCAST once IPIF_POINTPOINT gets changed?) -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
