Axalon....I did and it didn't help the sndconfig crash situation.  Which is
why I tried the downgrading of rhsound, sox and sndconfig.  And that is what
worked for me.

Alan

----- Original Message -----
From: Axalon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Sound Blaster Problems!


>
> Don't know if anyones pointed it out or asked but, have you updated
> the sox package with the one from Venus's updates?
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Don Kelley wrote:
>
> > ok, where did you get the red had rpm's you're talking about?  it's not
clear
> > from their web site - please point me in the correct direction - I'm
having
> > exactly the same problem with a crystal audio sound card, and also
having
> > other wierd problems with my ensonique.  I'd love to try the other
sndconfig
> > stuff from red hat!
> >
> > Don
> > ------------------
> > On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, you wrote: > You don't say which
> > soundblaster you're having troubles with but I am now > successfully
using the
> > PCI128 w/mdk 6.0.  I also had a problem with > sndconfig bombing out
when it
> > tried to play the test sound file and through > the
news:alt.os.linux.mandrake
> > newsgroup I discovered that if  I  replaced > mdk 6.0's sndconfig, sox
and
> > rhsound RPM's with RH 6.0's sndconfig, sox and > rhsound RPM's then the
PCI128
> > set up just fine.  I hope this might work for > your problem
soundblaster as
> > well. >  > Alan >  > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 1999 7:35 PM
> > > Subject: [newbie] Sound Blaster Problems!
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is weird  i never had a problem setting up sound rite from
RH.50 to
> > > RH5.2
> > > > but now after installing Mabdrake 6.0 whenever i run setup up to the
stage
> > > where
> > > > it says it's going to play a sample it suddenly says problems
parsing etc
> > > etc at
> > > > line 346 CTL etc etc ...  i open up conf.modules and take a look at
the
> > > > offending lines but  i don't see anything glaringly wrong...  any
help in
> > > > solving this is much appreciated...
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to