the part I really enjoy tho.. is who gets to decide, and by what criteria, what make a person a terrorist? that to me is (at the least) one of the biggest "malfunctions" of this whole pile. Am I a terrorist? what if I speak openly against the Bush Family? what if I call for the USA to join the "world court" and call to have George (the elder) stand trial as head of a country that lies to and kills it's own people and has attacked other sovereign countries only for his personal political or financial reasons. what if I call for enforced birth control for certain groups, like mentally incapable, (or maybe the indigenous people that require assistance, since they can't provide for themselves on the land they were forced to live on). and if the latter seems like, if the organization I headed, enforced the sterilization of indigenous people, that might be terrorism, then should not the head of the organization be accountable? I bet I could find a bunch American Indians who feel that whom ever is responsible for the end of their family tree should be held to stand trial. do you know any MUSLIM terrorist group that is committing genocide to the indigenous peoples of the land they live in? We don't have to kill the living to be guilty of ending the gene pool.
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 07:24 am, you wrote: > Em Ter 17 Set 2002 06:52, Alastair Scott escreveu: > > > As his motto: Or we agree with him or we are against him! > > You are absolutely right! > Although, I've listenned him saing that! > Great emphasis on TV! > I agree that the "idea" was what you mentioned, but ... > The problem I see is the "over-reaction" on this subject! > I think no one would like to start a Holy War! No one? some one must.... > And that's what were just about to fall over! > The americans and alies (us!) and the terrorist (mainly muslins!)! > That would be another Vietnam, considering that the "nams" didn't have > this kind of warfare the terrorist HAVE! As someone who was in The US Military at the end of the Vietnam conflict, I have to say, America did not loose the war, we realized it was not a "just" war, and quit fighting it. we controlled where ever we wanted, and posted signs saying "at 2pm this area will no longer be controlled by the US government" and guess what, as we left, someone else stepped in. call me a consiprisy theroy nut, but in my lifetime you will _never_ convince me that of Geo. the elder had not survived WW2, we would have never been in 'Nam. > Not to mentioned the religious aspect! > THIS is the issue I'm concerned! > And we all know who has introduced these mid-eastern countries on such > technology! (ex-alies!) > > We are all alies! Until one says... enough! Whatever the reason might be! > > We have to exhaust all means to keep peace! > At all cost? ;-) > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think he ever said that; what he > > actually said was 'either you are with us, or you are with the > > terrorists'. > > The myth is propagated (unfortunately) by the title of this > > extraordinary series of BBC radio programmes, which are crucial > > listening. _Everyone_ bar the President and Vice-President contributes: > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/news/withus.shtml > > Alastair
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
