as i recall the problem had to do with reiser being a module and not compiled 
into the kernel,

On Thursday 16 January 2003 01:03 pm, Charlie wrote:
> On January 16, 2003 08:44 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> <snip>
>
> >       I suspect XFS kernel support is iminent. I vaguely recall that
> > it's out for now because of a conflict with somethin else in the
> > current kernel, tho I can't remember what that is.
> >
> >     I've used ReiserFS and tried XFS several times for quite some time
> > now (7.x). I've always gone back to ReiserFS, but I believe either is
> > the preferable file system.  Civileme had the same opinion. One
> > caveat with either tho. It shouldn't make a differnence, but Civileme
> > use to always recommend that a small ext3 /boot partition be used.
> > Then any and all other partitions (/, /home, and so on) can be either
> > XFS or ReiserFS. IME, this does seem to provide the best results.
> > I've found ReiserFS to be faster than XFS on a desktop system.
>
> I'm positive you're right Tom but I can't for the life of me remember what
> the conflict was. oops!
>
> The partition table for my system hda has an ext2 /boot (250 MB) that
> hasn't been touched for over a year other than what new installs have put
> there. / is ext3 and everything else XFS. On this machine XFS was the
> fastest and seemed to work the best.
>
> I'll be changing the two disks Mandrake has lived on so I can install betas
> whether Juan gets XFS going again or not. The last time I tried Reiser FS I
> had trouble with this old bucket. I think that was when 7.2 Freq was the
> 'latest and greatest' though. There have been improvements I'm certain.
>
> Questions: I've been considering making hdb all ext3 so I won't have to
> touch it again for a while.
> Or should it be Reiser?
> To this point that drive has been a sort of "holding tank" for images,
> downloads, music, miscellaneous what evers. I made the first half of it
> (after I cleared it) ext3 when I was first fooling with beta1. It's a 60 GB
> Maxtor. Four duplicates in fact but Mandrake only gets to play with the
> first two. Would you recommend making it all ext3, or all Reiser?
> Either is acceptable since it doesn't take much longer to do the back half
> than to do it all.
>
> Since I'll have to do a lot of swapping of directories and files before I
> touch another install; and I'll have to do a complete back-up of /home in
> order to change it from XFS to Reiser or ext3 I'd like advice on what would
> be the safest bet for the file system to use please. I can use part of the
> other two disks to do the "back-up" of the Mandrake two but I don't want to
> start until I'm sure I won't have to do it again in a week or ten days when
> the next beta comes along.
>
> Or should I do the b-ups, format those two disks, and install the latest
> cooker for testing? Either way I'll lose the install of 9.0 I have so it
> matters not to me. I'd just like to use a file system that I can stay with.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards;


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to