On Monday 28 Jul 2003 6:47 pm, Michael Adams wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:10:09 -0700 > > Eric Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Isn't it easier to simply suppress popups (Moz) or use smart > > > denial of popups (Konq)? > > > > For popups that is probably true, assuming you are using moz or > > konq. > > > > But this was for ads that don't popup. > > Some sites i go to have flashy ads that make page scrolling jumpy > > just because the animation is running. > > Also, it's nicer to read pages w/o the ads cluttering it up. > > > > eric > > I actually wondered about blocking requests from HTML to servers > other than the page originator. This would break some sites, but i > wonder how many of those sites i want to see anyways. It would work > something like this. > > I follow a link > HTTP page request (server details noted) > page comes in < HTTP page delivery > browser renders HTML > HTML code requests a graphic/etc > > > HTTP request to noted server approved > > -HTTP request to any other server dropped > > > My guess is it could only be implimented on the browser itself. Be > one hell of a security feature though, less than half the cookies, > and speed up surfing no end.
Unless I misunderstand you, this is just what Mozilla offers. I used to use it in Netscape, but now I find that using that disables on-line banking and too many other useful sites are broken. I've compromised and use the blocks on a site-by-site basis. Anne
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
