On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 13:02, Lanman wrote:
> HaywireMac; No knickers to worry about! You might be right about the hijack, under 
> the conditions you specified.
> I didn't see a hijack happening, because my thread was under a different name. Just 
> so you know, I've never even
> seen any list of rules, didn't even know they existed until now. When I signed onto 
> the list (dinaosaurs were just
> fading out of existence back then, LOL!), there weren't any rules mentioned there. 
> Usually, I use the "reply" function
> in my email client to respond or to post to the list. Since the function is there, I 
> just make use of it. But if I'm changing
> the contents of the subject-line, I interpret that as a new thread. Maybe that's 
> where I'm going wrong?
yep


> Or maybe the server just handles it that way.
Or (yep) BOTH... (go figure)


> Perhaps if someone created a HowTo and made it a bit more obvious than a list of 
> rules that some don't even know about?
> However, if I misspoke, I also apologize. You just caught me by surprise on that 
> one! Have you got a link to these rules?
> 
> Lanman
> 
> 
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> 
> On 8/24/2003 at 1:56 PM HaywireMac wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:57:18 -0400
> >"Lanman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> >
> >>
> >> Excuse me? I thought this was a thread about Mandrake 9.2 Beta2? What
> >> did I hijack? Please define a hijack for me, so I can avoid it.
> >> Besides, isn't this a List about Mandrake Linux? It has been since I
> >> joined 4 years ago ! Please explain how I could've hijacked a thread
> >> when I believe I was the one who posted this in the first place!
> >
> >Well, from the way the thread looks here (*possibly* due to threading
> >issues with the list, so if that is the case, I most humbly apologize),
> >your 9.2 beta post was in reply to Stephen Kuhn, who was replying to
> >the thread started by Claire Suttle about her problem with getting good
> >9.1 ISOs. In that sense it *appears* you "hijacked" Claire's thread,
> >possibly reducing the likelyihood that she would get more responses.
> >
> >I checked the list archive and it shows the same way, so it is
> >*defintitely* not a problem on my end.
> >
> >Anyway, don't get your knickers in a knot.
> >
> >Oh, and BTW, the list rules specifically ask you to limit your line wrap
> >to 68-72 characters, IIRC.
> >
> >--
> >HaywireMac
> >Registered Linux user #282046
> >Homepage: nodex.sytes.net
> >++++++++++++++++++++++
> >It is so stupid of modern civilisation to have given up believing in the
> >devil when he is the only explanation of it.
> >             -- Ronald Knox, "Let Dons Delight"
> >
> >
> >Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> >Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to