On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 22:06, ed tharp wrote:
 
> it is my opinion and that of my ahhhhturnney, that cognizant thinking is
> still subservient to my patent on 'grip' (also incorrectly referred to
> as 'grasp'&trade). as in 'in order to cognizance, you have to have a
> grip on the subject.
> this 'grip' is equal to the grip (or grasp&trade) that one uses to pick
> up an object, such as a pencil or ink pin in order to write. it is also
> something I should worn about is that while grasp&trade is not
> patentable (since it is the same as previously patented grip) it is
> however protected by my trademark registration and also my copyright on
> the word, as well as my patent on the letters 'a' and the letter
> combination of 'gr'. Of course both g&r are under separate patents and
> are lic. accordingly.

Well, I concede - I'll let you and that dang hillbilly Aron duke it
out...have to go and skin a cat right now...

stephen kuhn - owner
==============================
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0catch.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
------------------------------------------------------------------
The only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from
history. -- Hegel I know guys can't learn from yesterday ... Hegel must
be taking the long view. -- John Brunner, "Stand on Zanzibar"


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to