On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 08:44:25AM -0500, Tom Brinkman wrote: > On Saturday 08 May 2004 03:03 pm, Greg Meyer wrote: > > > ->I'll give a prize to the first poster that can recognize > > > the song I used by ->listening to this. I did compress it > > > again to save bandwidth, but it won't ->change your > > > impressssion about how much of a track is lost when it is > > > ->compressed, even at a high quality like I did here. -> > > > ->http://cybercfo.gkmweb.com/diff_q6.ogg > > > > > > Queen..."Crazy Little Thing Called Love"...or something like > > > that? > > > > We have a winner. I said you'd get a prize, but I lied :-p > > > > It is really astounding to me that one can figure out the song > > from listening to the difference between the original and the > > compressed version. > > Hell, I'm still tryin to figure out what y'all are talkin > about ;) Not to hijack, but I will since the original query > seems to be satisfied ;) > > I'm still stuck in mp3. I've got a paid news server (giganews). > Just about any artist and their albums are available, anytime, > but only as mp3's. Most are 160 or higher encodes, mostly 192 or > variable (up to 256). I've got audio cd's floatin out my ears ;)
alt.binaries.sounds.ogg alt.binaries.sounds.lossless But shhhhhhh. Todd -- Name that tune #22: No caffeine, no protein, no booze or nicotine.
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
