On Monday 23 August 2004 01:18 pm, Lanman wrote: > Tom Brinkman wrote: > > On Monday 23 August 2004 06:52 am, Lanman wrote: > >>zamri wrote: > >>>I thought that your "iso"s are corrupt. Have u check with > >>>md5sum ? > >> > >>Yup! ISO's were verified and passed OK. Any other ideas? Has > >>anyone been able to download and install Beta 2 ? I don't know > >>if the same problem would have occurred with an upgrade as > >>well, but this was a fresh install. > >> > >>Lanman > > > > Just checkin the d/l'd iso's isn't sufficient, you should also > > verify the burned CD's with > > tom # md5sum /dev/hdd (<-- my burner, CD1 in it) > > 469e937f91b8716c865d172ac0be09f8 /dev/hdd > > > > dl # cat Mandrakelinux-10.1beta2.md5.asc > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > 469e937f91b8716c865d172ac0be09f8 > > Mandrakelinux-10.1beta2-CD1.i586.iso > > c873f678d99c4f968d991dbfea71f01f > > Mandrakelinux-10.1beta2-CD2.i586.iso > > c71ff830c865bcb72160a53412938cca > > Mandrakelinux-10.1beta2-CD3.i586.iso > > > > Tho all my beta2 CDr's pass, I haven't used them. > > > > I suspect udev. Mandrake seems intent upon switching to it, > > and as of beta 2 you can't use both (ie, devfs and udev). I'm > > runnin a fresh beta 1 install, updated (now past beta 2) to > > current cooker. I lost my cd drives with udev, so I urpme'd it > > and re-installed devfs, edited lilo.conf to devfs=mount . Now > > they're again recognized as ATA: devices. > > > > You might try the install again, choosing devfs in pkg > > selection. (which should eliminte udev ?) ... or search 'udev' > > on the cooker ml archive or bugzilla for more (better;) info. > > Thanks Tom & Dennis. > > I tried your suggestions but the CD's are fine (I did a sum check on the > finished CD's as well), and I didn't have any drive problems either. I > re-installed 10.1 Beta 1, created an rpm archive and copies all the 10.1 > Beta2 rpms into it. Then I ran "genhdlist", and added this archive as my > only urpmi source location. All updates are done and system seems fine. > i did the kernel install separately from a console and updated Lilo. > > Everything seems to be fine. There were absolutely no errors in the rpm > packages (as I suspected), so I think this installer was simply pointing > at the wrong location or some other minor thing was wrong. In either > case, I'm about to reboot with the updated 10.1 Beta2, so keep your > fingers crossed! > > Once this reboot is done, I'll add the usual source location s and get > the rest of my preferred packages installed - again. > > Thanks again, Guys! > > Lanman Lanman, did I miss it or did you say that Beta2 installed for you? -- Dennis M. linux user #180842
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
