On Monday 24 January 2005 06:31 pm, Andy Yankovich wrote: > Please, do not assume this is apostasy. > > What are the main differences between SUSE Pro 9.2 and Mandrake > 10.1? 9.2 is installable in thinkpads with out modification 10.1 is not
9.2 uses KDE 3.1 10.1 uses KDE 3.2 which has close x on tab windows which cause you to accidentally close the screen all the time. Other than than for usage not much. If you have 9.2 working personally I don't believe it is worth the effort to upgrade unless you enjoy upgrading. > > My understanding of SUSE is that it includes integrated Opera > 7.54, Firefox and Thunderbird on its DVD. I also understand that > beginning about two weeks ago and continuing for a few weeks, one > may download and burn into a DVD the Pro 9.2 version of SUSE. > > It is also my understanding that I would be able to run Libronix > Bible Software on SUSE with its inclusion of Opera, and the > addition of Cross Over from Codeweavers. I have tried to install > Opera from The Club and failed miserably - undoubtedly due to my > lack of know-how. > > Are there compelling reasons why Mandrake is still preferred? > > Am I misinformed? You guys are a great bunch and have already > provided many of us newbies with a tremendous amount of freely > and gladly given support, for which we all are grateful. > > I would truly appreciate your responses. > > Andy
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
