-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 27 February 2005 07:46, Derek Jennings wrote: > On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:51, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote: > > On Saturday 26 February 2005 22:29, Ronald J. Hall wrote: > > > On Sunday 27 February 2005 01:24 am, Derek Jennings wrote: > > > > On Saturday 26 February 2005 16:06, David Anderson wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I am following Derek Jennings' excellent Postfix mail server > > > > > configuration document, and have got stuck in the SpamAssassin > > > > > part. The doc says that you need to install the RPM, and then start > > > > > the spamassassin service in Mandrake Control > > > > > Centre>System>Services. Unfortunately there is no entry for > > > > > SpamAssassin. . Can anyone give an incantation to get it there (or > > > > > even visible in Webmin)? > > > > > > > > > > The RPM is SpamAssassin-3.0.2-0.1010.lmdk.i586.rpm. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > David > > > > > > > > The service is called 'spamd' I'll correct the document. > > > > > > > > derek > > > > > > Hmm, I'm still running v9.2 here so some things may be different, and > > > if they are, I apologise for wasting the bandwith but... > > > > > > here...if I use "spamd" it takes a lot longer to d/l my e-mail. If I > > > use "spamc" on the other hand, all is well. > > > > > > Just a random observation there. > > > > > > PS This however, is not with postfix, just running it through kmail. > > > > Thatīs my problem too! > > > > How can I change from spamd to spamc, since spamd is started at boot > > time? > > > > Ricardo Castanho > > Brazil > > I think there is a little misunderstanding here. > > You can use spamassassin in two ways. > > Firstly as a perl standalone application, in which case you call it with > the command 'spamassassin'. This is the simplest way to use spamassassin. > See 'man spamassassin' > > Or secondly as a pair of C programmes called spamd and spamc. Spamd is the > daemon which runs continuously, and spamc is the client to access spamd. > Spamd/spamc are better for larger mail servers because they have much > smaller memory requirements and are faster. > > My guide describes using spamd/spamc with a Postfix server. > See 'man spamc' > > derek
Ok! Got it now! I just thought of the opposite! But in my machine, spamd/spamc are not at all fast and requires a lot of processing power! (this machine is a PII-400 256Mb ram) Ricardo Castanho Brazil - -- ========================================================== Linux user # 102240 => PGP: 748A9E35 => 100% M$ FREE ========================================================== Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:55:00 -0300 22:55:00 up 18:51, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.07 Comparing information and knowledge is like asking whether the fatness of a pig is more or less green than the designated hitter rule." - -- David Guaspari -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCInq6lyXj13SKnjURAnIkAJwPX+gDfKe9YsqFIm20ftoBKjLh2QCfXBqz UiM62CWzcfHPeF+cR5DR3fQ= =V8Hf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
