Sure sounds like it. If you're going to have a penguin as a pet, a
little humour is highly encouraged. 

Roman
Registered Linux User #179293


Mark Weaver wrote:
> 
> sounds like this guy has been sitting at his monitor too long and has
> consumed massive quantities of coffee! He needs to unplug for a while and
> go pee!!  ;)
> 
> --
> Mark
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> **  =/\=  No Penguins were harmed       |
> ** <_||_> in the making of this         |
> **  =\/=  message...                    | Registered Linux user #182496
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Romanator wrote:
> 
> > Frank Nazario wrote:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > [since I received only 35 Newbie on the 25th, none on the 26th & 27th I'm
> > > > reposting this.  If there was an answer I would appreciate it if someone
> > > > would forward it to me.  I had thought that the Newbie server might be down,
> > > > but since I have only a few (rather than scads) messages from Newbie today
> > > > I'm assuming that I just didn't get my mail for some reason.]
> > > >
> > > >     Apple has always used Motorola.  But I never heard the final disposition
> > > > of the copyright issue for the microprocessor chip itself.  Last I heard some
> > > > guy in a garage was going to be granted the basic patent for the
> > > > microprocessor.  What became of this?  -Gary-
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated 7/23/2000 11:54:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > writes:
> > > >
> > > > <<
> > > >  Didn't Intel originally own the patent rights for some of the early
> > > >  chips that Apple and other companies were using?
> > > >
> > > >  Roman
> > > >   >>
> > >
> > > this has nothing to do with linux or mandrake .......this is not the forum to
> > > discuss this. if you are interested go to the motorola forum and ask there
> > > .........zyeeeeezzzz . THIS IS A LINUX FORUM!!!!!!! AND MAILING LIST
> >
> > Calm down. The temporary discussion started when the mail was down.
> >
> >

Reply via email to