[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Is there a compilable kernel anywhere on this planet that will not bail
> >on your with a ridiculous error making it impossible to update or
> >recompile your kernel in any manner? Below is the result of my latest
> >attempt to configure and compile a linux kernel. This one is
> >2.4.0-test9. Frankly I'm beginning to think its a lost stinkin cause.
> >
> >
> >sincerely fed up and frustrated,
> >
> >Mark
>
> Ummm....ok first you are going to have to do some digging to find out what
> you need for the header/include files you are missing OR if you have them
> ... check to see where the current tree (for the compile) is looking for
> them. Can you send the output from a find / -name errno.h none of what
> you have posted is *post* compilation and it looks like it couldn't create
> the .o files to link in in order to continue. Compiling isn't always as
> easy as "./configure, make, make install" ;-) or make make bzImage make
> dep make modules etc etc, trouble shoot this first by figuring out where
> the missing includes are or if you have them "usr/include/bits/errno.h:25:
> linux/errno.h: No such file or directory" (you may have to look in the
> Makefile(s) to see what the root dir is in order to find out "where" it
> thinks linux/errno.h is or what linux actually is pointing to ... its
> usually a sym link to the CURRENT kernel source .... ls -l should be
> pretty easy to work from there =o)
>
> -Lonny
>
> +++++++++++++
>
> In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36,
> from scripts/split-include.c:26:
> /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory
<snip>
Did you download the matching kernal-headers?
I had something similar when I attempted my first kernal compile
on 2.2.16 from a tarball.
Cheers
--
ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
(The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)
