good, that will drive people in droves to linux,,,
MS know that, thats why they hate and attack it at every turn...
They don't like the fact that a viable alternative has appeared, they
probablly thought that was over when OS2 dies.. (also a better OS then
windows.)
If this list and all the other lists I am on are any indication of the
growing trends, Microsnot are on the way out,, slowly but surely.
can that possibly be a bad thing?
Frank Hauptle
----/ / _
---/ / (_)__ __ ____ __
--/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
-/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Gshop & Network Payment Solutions.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2001 6:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] If this will not turn businesses to Linux I don't
know what will.
But isn't the MS whole plot is to have you "rent" or "lease" software from
the .NET and ASPs. What they seem to be doing is making harder and harder
for someone to buy and install software on their own machine. They don't
want anyone to control the software and the PC. I would not doubt that in a
couple of years you will have to pay by the hour to run MS Windows but
they'll obsfuscate in a way such that they make it look like you are paying
a service (like an electrical utility) to run their software...
-----Original Message-----
From: Civileme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] If this will not turn businesses to Linux I don't
know what will.
On Tuesday 01 May 2001 02:07, you wrote:
> The original e-mail came from Toronto LUG. Buying a "naked" computer
might
> soon be against the law. Sort of scarry thing. Unfortunatelly too many
> people are addicted to Windows, that's enough to make this work. Just
> thought I share it with good people of Mandrake list.
>
> Here's the first link.
>
> > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/18589.html
> > >
> > > Here is the second.
> > >
> > > http://www.aaxnet.com/news/M010425.html
It is certainly within their rights to do this, and it is certainly within
their potential to be a predatory practice. No one is likely to have
complied with the licenses well enough to withstand an audit--(You really
need a J.D. degree to break the shrink wrap). For example, a number of
years
ago many people bought NT workstation to run Netscape Enterprise Server,
then
in the blink of a MS attorney's eye, NT workstation became a license
violation for more than 10 simultaneous connections, and everyone had to go
buy NT Server which included "free" IIS. Yes this happened POST purchase.
Yes, the agreement said they could do it! Yes, the US constitution protects
citizens from the application of ex post facto laws by Congress but not from
signing away their own rights by breaking shrink wrap.
And it is likely to make the company even more hated than it is, if
possible.
I have no problem with that, but Microsoft is giving personal computers a
bad
name and making a bad taste in the buyer's mouths. Perhaps the slump in PC
sales is partially attributable to their activities and their playing the
role of 400kilo gorilla to perfection.
Civileme
