yep, but it Appears to me that it went to the list as a result of a mail to
the list from someone whom Jose Sanchez answered:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Linux
Newbie
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] zip250 way too slow
"the zip250 used to have good speed, but now is way too slow, this is
not acceptable and must be corrected."
Ok correct it!
(Sorry I couldn't resist, it sounds like you EXPECT an IMMEDIATE
response, as if someone owes it to you...)
On Sunday 12 August 2001 21:49, Jose M. Sanchez wrote:
> This "Abuse & Spam" control is from "kittypuss.org" not mandrake, so it
> has nothing to do with the list, AFAIK.
>
> -JMS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of etharp
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 6:15 PM
> To: Abuse & Spam control Department; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] zip250 way too slow
>
>
> I don't think there has been the sort of abuse that one would wish to
> have an
> acct pulled for. At least not that I have seen.
>
> Of course the only thing that would justify pulling an acct. (for me)
> would
> be spam or M$ viruses comming from or through the domain. Heck this does
> not
> look like _MY_ idea of "Internet-Abuse". If someone cannot "spout off"
> or
> flame a little when frustrated, the next step might in blowing off steam
>
> might be a little less desirable?
>
> On Sunday 12 August 2001 16:29, Abuse & Spam control Department wrote:
> > Sorry for the intrusion, I received a complaint about a user on our
> > local system, is it your wish that I pull this user's acct?
> >
> > On Sunday 12 August 2001 08:09 pm, so spoke poogle:
> > > On Sunday 12 August 2001 14:16, you wrote:
> > > > OK I guess no one cares about helping, I tried to
> > > > put in as much as I knew, but no one was willing
