On Monday 11 February 2002 08:46 am, Chuck Henson wrote: > At 02:29 AM 2/11/02 +0100, you wrote: > >Now Hanan, why on earth use a mediocre WYSIWYG-editor when it's so simple > > to write real HTML ? > > As a web designer myself, I can only give one answer. > > There is no excuse for using a mediocre editor when there are some very > good ones available. At least ones that can handle the more monotonous > tasked involved in page layout. Then as long, as long as you do know how to > hand code, you can shape things up as you see fit, and make things happen > much more quickly in my opinion. > > I wouldn't throw Dreamweaver away if you paid me to. Of course, I can't get > it to work with Linux so I'm forced to have a Windows/Linux partition > battle. Anyhow, if I had to loose DW then I would probably still try to use > NoteTab, UltraEdit, or HTML-kit to make things a little bit more automated.
Thank you! I used to use UltraEdit and was quite satisfied with the way it works. I agree that Quanta has equivalent or better functionality, though, plus it runs on Linux. If that's the SOLE reason you're keeping Windows,....kill it! > Cathal ap Donnchadh > ............................... > Tobar naomh, ruith a steach mise! > Teinne naomh, ls a steach mise! > Crann naomh, fas a steach mise! > ............................... My Gaelic's rusty. What does this translate as? Off-list is fine. Regards, David R -- "Natives who beat drums to drive off evil spirits are objects of scorn to smart Americans who blow horns to break up traffic jams."
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
