John,

You've done well so far, finding a bug that is apparently the same
problem you are having.

The next thing you must do is try to determine whether the 22 Apr 2002
report that the problem is fixed in CVS means that the fix:
   * should be in the version of KSpread that you have (meaning that the
bug really is not fixed, and you should update the bug to tell the
developer it is not fixed), or 
   * should be in a version of KSpread that is already released but you
don't have yet (meaning you should think about upgrading), or 
   * should be in the next version to be released (meaning you need to
wait for a new version to be released -- unless you want to try to
compile your own upgraded version which I do not recommend -- just
because I would find that painful to do).  

I don't follow KSpread well enough to know which is the case, but based
on the 22 Apr 2002 fix date, I suspect we have to wait for the next
version of kde/kspread to be released.

If you do have to update the bug report, you can do so by emailing more
information to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Include all the information that is relevant, save
a sample file that demonstrates the problem, and offer to send it the
developer on request (unless you have a web site or something similar
where you can make it available for download).

Randy Kramer

John Richard Smith wrote:
> 
> By way of a final conclusion to this interesting thread.
> I found on http://bugs.kde.org/db/31/31/31753.html
> an interesting report I reproduce here :-
> 
> KDE bug report logs - #31753
>  slow load save timePackage: kspread; Reported by: cktwo
>  at mehring ca;
>  Done: Philipp =?iso-8859-1?q?M=FCller?= <philipp mueller at gmx de>;
>  Maintainer for kspread is Montel Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>  Send additional info to 31753 at bugs.kde.org.
>  Message received at bugs.kde.org:
>  From: Philipp =?iso-8859-1?q?M=FCller?= <philipp.mueller at gmx.de>
>  Reply-To: philipp.mueller at gmx.de
>  To: 31753-done at bugs.kde.org
>  Subject: Re: slow load save time
>  Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:44:59 +0200
> 
>  Thank you for your bug report.
>  The bug that you reported has been identified, and has been fixed in
>  the latest development (CVS) version of KDE. The bug report will be
>  closed.
>  Notification sent to cktwo at mehring.ca:
>  Bug acknowledged by developer. Full text available.
>  Reply sent to philipp.mueller at gmx.de:
>  You have taken responsibility. Full text available.
>  Message received at bugs.kde.org: Date: 29 Aug 2001 06:52:34 -0000
>  Subject: slow load save time             From: cktwo at mehring.ca
> 
>  Package: kspread
>  Version: 1.1 (using KDE 2.2.0 )
>  Severity: normal
>  Installed from: RedHat RPMs
>  Compiler: Not Specified
>  OS: Linux
>  OS/Compiler notes: Not Specified
>  When loading a simple/small spreadsheet, it takes a long
>  time to load and save. It got worse it seems from 1.1Rc 1 to 1.1final
>  On a P1000 it takes about 10 seconds, on P300, about 1 minute
>  I have made the file available at:
>  ftp://mehring.ca/pub/kspreadslow.ksp
> 
>  (Submitted via bugs.kde.org)
>  (Called from KBugReport dialog. Fields Application,
>  KDE Version, OS, Compiler manually changed)
>  Acknowledgement sent to cktwo at mehring.ca:
>  New bug report received and forwarded.
>  Copy sent to Montel Laurent <lmontel at mandrakesoft.com>.
>  Full text available.
>  Report forwarded to kde-bugs-dist at master.kde.org,
>  Montel Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  Bug#31753; Package kspread. Full text available.
>  Stephan Kulow / [EMAIL PROTECTED], through the KDE bug database Last
>  modified: 05:39:02 GMT Wed 22 May (timestamp page available).
> 
>  ....................................................................
>   Please note,
>   The bug that you reported has been identified, and has been fixed
>   in  the latest development (CVS) version of KDE.
> 
>   Well,
>   LM8.2 has ksp 1.1.1(using KDE2.2.2) so I tried loading it in there
>   (I haven't started using my new computer yet , still getting things
>     just right) This machine is an AMD Athlon1800 ,more than 3 times
>     the processor power, and 4 times the memory, and the same file
>     took 7 seconds, and I would say that equates roughly equal to the
>     21seconds it took on my current machine. I don't think this
>     version is fixed at all.
> 
> What would you do to report a bug ?
> 
> John
> 
> --
> John Richard Smith
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to