The only problem is a gallon of water is more than a gallon of gas ;)

-Kyle

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, stanley/ Randolph <[email protected]>wrote:

> The higher the compression ratio, the more likely you need higher octane
> fuel.  You can *overcome* that neccessity with water injection, however,
> which lowers the temprature and at the same time makes a more complete burn
> because the fuel droplets surround the water droplets, being lighter; and
> when they burn, the water absorbs some of the energy and becomes steam very
> rapidly which makes the remaining  unburned fuel droplets even smaller, so
> they burn faster and the burn completes before the flamewall gets to the top
> of the piston and through it, theoreticallyTo understand more clearly,
> picture a log.  It takes it a loong time to burn, like overnight, for
> instance, in a Jotul stove.  Now picture some wood shavings.  They are not
> only easier to ignite, they burn quite fast by comparison.
> The gasoline gets "atomized" either by a carburetor or fuel injectors.  The
> finer the droplets, the better the burn.
> Weber makes fine carbs that will cause the fuel to extract more power out
> of the same engine because the fuel comes out in such a fine mist.
> Sometimes it is so much more power that it is noticeable when you hit the
> gas.  The engine will use less fuel, also, because more of what it gets,
> gets burned before the exhaust valve begins to open.
> Beetle engines came from the factory with about a 7.9:1 C/R.  They can use
> 87 octane.
> If I were to up that compression in my engine to 10.5 or more, I would
> either have to use premium or add water injection.  I choose the latter
> because I get more performance and nearly double my mileage from about 31 -
> 32 to about 58, give or take; plus, the engine stays cleaner; and unless you
> add an aftermarket filter on a Beetle, that's important, because they have
> no filter and I used to change my oil every 1500 miles.  That wasn't so
> expensive, because Beetles only use 3 qts. of oil.  Just a little more than
> a Nighthawk..
> Actually, what Kyle said below is essentially the same thing; I didn't
> notice he wrote it after you asked the question (lol).
> And Kyle - I know of a chap who replaced the pistons in his Ford Focus with
> hi comp - 12.7s - and added water injection.  That's all he did, and it
> increased his power (don't know how much, but a lot; no dyno) and his
> mileage went from 25 mpg to 50.  This, on regular 87 gas.
> Kinda like NOS without the risk of blowin' yer engine...
>
>
> *Stanley*
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Javier Garcia <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:31:00 AM
>
> *Subject:* [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Gasoline, octane and oil
>
>
> Stanley, I'm a little bit confused... in your first message it seems to me
> you don't agree in using high octane gasoline... in the second, you talked
> about engines damages due to the use of low octane gasoline... can clarify?
> I'm not really an expert, so I get lost very easily.
> Thanks, Javier.
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Kyle Munz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I used to run into the same problem with my turbo cars. The higher the
>> boost the higher the octane rating you needed since it effectively ups the
>> compression. Most ppl understand octane meanings backwards. It actually
>> means it's less likely to ignite, which is good if you're running high
>> compression, or high boost. With higher gas prices I understand people
>> wanting to put the cheap stuff in, but like Stanley says, newer cars will
>> retard the timing when they detect knock, which means they burn more fuel
>> anyways, so you didn't save as much money as you would have liked. One of
>> the benefits of ethanol is a very high octane rating, so you could run
>> really high compression or really high boost, and thus get more power,
>> however this just isn't feasible for road cars now matter how much the corn
>> lobby thinks it is. Long and short of it is, just put in what the
>> manufacturer suggests, if the engine was designed for lower octane then put
>> that in the tank. If you want to put "the good stuff" in your tank, then go
>> to a name brand station, such as chevron/texaco, exxon/mobile, or shell and
>> stay away from the discount dealers. This applies no matter what octane you
>> decide to buy.
>>
>> -Kyle
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, stanley/ Randolph 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>   If you know the research about octane and flamewalls and compression
>>> ratios, you would have a different attitude about that.  Low octane fuel
>>> will demolish a high comp engine. I have taken apart Porsche engines they
>>> were putting in Beetle vans, with the rings all cracked and melted into
>>> their landings from using low octane for their compression ratio.  And this
>>> despite the *decal by the gas tank* stating a minimum of 92 octane!!!
>>> This engine was still running, but I have seen engines with holes in the
>>> heads, the pistons, one which was ruined beyond repair with the hole outside
>>> of the valve insert.  It is not good if you use low octane in a high comp
>>> engine.  The flame wall is meeting the piston as it comes up, and when the
>>> heated wall of fire hits the piston and you *hear* the knock, back off,
>>> or you *will* ruin your engine.
>>> The engines today have knock sensors sending data to the computer to
>>> retard the timing when the flamewall gets too close to the piston crown.
>>> When timing was only a mechanically actuated centrifugal advance, one
>>> couldn't actually retard it, so the only thing one could do is back off the
>>> gas, or go around with permanently retarded timing, which defeats the
>>> purpose of higher compression: greater engine efficiency and/or more power.
>>> An old wrench gave me an engine for taking it out of this van he bought
>>> cheap and that's what I found when I took it apart.  Happy to say, though,
>>> bottom end was excellent.  Nice thing about those engines -  is it was not
>>> too expensive to replace those pistons and cylinders.  I had me a new engine
>>> for the labor and $80.00 for new set of P&C and a valve job with new exhaust
>>> valves. Gasket set was the second most expensive item: $29.00;  for regular
>>> Beetle engines the gasket set was only $4.00, and a new set of P&C was less
>>> than $40.00 for Brazilian Cima/Mahles or a Jap brand name escapes me), both
>>> of which were close to German quality.
>>> The only safe thing to do when rebuilding the Porsche engines is to lower
>>> the C/R, because people think, it's just a VW (van/microbus).  It doesn't
>>> really need premium gas.
>>> Until, of course, it's usually too late...
>>>
>>> *Stanley*
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Creative Residential Designs <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 17, 2009 7:37:45 AM
>>> *Subject:* [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Gasoline, octane and oil
>>>
>>> Try telling that to my '69 GTO, Dick. It will NOT run on anything
>>> else...period. It doesn't care what you or I think about premium gas, it
>>> will ping and knock and carry on until I feed it the best gas there is.
>>> (Texaco or Shell premium ONLY).
>>> I just read a study on gas on the 'net as well. Interesting how abrasive
>>> low-end fuels are to an engine. I'll try and locate it again. Apparently
>>> it's one of those "you are what you eat" situations. HotrodMamma.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> *From:* Dick MacInnes <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2009 9:10 PM
>>> *Subject:* [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Gasoline, octane and oil
>>>
>>> The only place to get the proper service Manuel is Helm. Inc
>>> And premium gasoline is a waste of money, I don't care what anyone has
>>> told you.
>>>
>>> Dick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to