http-nanny sounds like an @substack module.
On Wednesday, February 8, 2012 12:24:29 PM UTC-8, Dean Landolt wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Mikeal Rogers <mikeal.rog...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> This is the exact same conversation we had over the host header. >> >> Unfortunately the host header went in at first without a way to disable >> it. Now there is, we should replicate that. >> > > Yes. That. Something like what Tim Caswell suggested would be wonderful. > > I don't want to suppress this header for efficiency -- it's useful for > testing other web services in the face of invalid requests. I don't mind > node doing the right thing by default, but we don't need an http nanny. >
