Ember has a better code structure and is more suited to "ambitious" projects. Indeed Ember is heavy, but this cost comes with the benefit of having pretty much anything you need to run your application without worrying too much. The only downsides to Ember to this day are :
- Ember-Data is misleading newcomers into thinking they need it - Render times for large collections aren't great. This is being worked on and is also a great flaw of Angular anyway - No animated transitions, which is also hard to get right in Angular anyway. This is being worked on. On 18 February 2014 10:50, Ziobudda <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Floby, why do you consider Ember better (“promising solution") than > AngularJS ? > > Thanks. > > M. > -- > Michel 'ZioBudda' Morelli [email protected] > Sviluppo applicazioni CMS DRUPAL e web dinamiche (LAMP+Ajax) > Telefono: 0200619074 > Mobile: +39-3939890025 -- Fax: +39-0291390660 > > http://www.ziobudda.net Skype: zio_budda > http://www.ziobuddalabs.it Twitter: ziobudda > -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
