For the bystanders: one thing that's funny about all this is that I use Non
every day, including NSM, and I have a very low tolerance for buggy/crashy
software, and in all this time, with all the fork drama etc. I've worked on
Non, adding things I need, fixing bugs I encounter. Well, in all of that, I
can't recall having needed to make a single change to NSM. It just works.
So this idea that there's is or was some dire usability issue with NSM is
to me laughable.) Sure, there are many things I wish I had. Fillipe says
that JACKPatch has some "usability problem." I disagree. It is what it is.
But it would be nice to have a better connection manager than Patchage to
pair with it, and maybe some extra info from the JACK API to identify
certain tricky scenarios that JACKPatch currently has no way to know about.
Maybe if I could drive home the NSM "everything is a client" philosophy a
little harder, people would stop blaming NSM for being incomplete, when the
fact is that it was never intended to be a complete solution for anything
other than supporting sessions of clients. Clients therefore, are the seat
of your extensibility. Write a client that does something cool and you can
have all the fame you like and with no obligation to share it with me or
NSM.


On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 4:09 PM Filipe Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 03/01/21 23:57, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Monday, January 4, 2021 12:47 AM, Filipe Coelho <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 1. the new-session-manager fork was done by Nils, not me. I appreciated
> the effort and contributed some little things afterwards.
>
> The idea for a fork was yours Filipe. You're fully responsible for it,
> together with Nils. There is no point in denying or downplaying your role.
>
> Huh? Where did you get this from?
>
> I approved the idea of a fork, yes. Not sure if I was the first one to
> suggest it, I am pretty sure a bunch of people thought about it too.
> I did say that I would maintain the "old" GUI if needed, you can point the
> finger at me for that.
>
> But wait, just because I have an idea for something, how does it make me
> responsible for it?
> It would not have happened if others did not have interest on it.
>
> Stop making it all on me.
> Thanks
>
>
>

Reply via email to