I did not know about New Session Manager, only a bit about Non.

Now I'm reading this page: https://linuxaudio.github.io/new-session-manager/

The description looks like Non is almost a proprietary software, and that New is trying to "fix that" as a "community version". Non is released as a GPL2 software, so clearly there was no need to fork it as a "community version". It there's a better reason (that could be mentioned)?

GPL2 does not mean "free lunch"; there's other licenses for that.

Marc


Le 21-01-03 à 19 h 08, Filipe Coelho a écrit :
On 03/01/21 23:57, rosea.grammostola wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, January 4, 2021 12:47 AM, Filipe Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:

1. the new-session-manager fork was done by Nils, not me. I appreciated the effort and contributed some little things afterwards.

The idea for a fork was yours Filipe. You're fully responsible for it, together with Nils. There is no point in denying or downplaying your role.

Huh? Where did you get this from?

I approved the idea of a fork, yes. Not sure if I was the first one to suggest it, I am pretty sure a bunch of people thought about it too. I did say that I would maintain the "old" GUI if needed, you can point the finger at me for that.

But wait, just because I have an idea for something, how does it make me responsible for it?
It would not have happened if others did not have interest on it.

Stop making it all on me.
Thanks


Reply via email to