On 12/15/25 20:29, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 15.12.25 um 20:11 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context: >> [...] >> I have checked the signature fields and we have problems with digitally >> sign that with any other than “Acrobat”. > > Hi Pablo, > > thank you! I will include your statement in my book. IMO it makes no > sense to try to use this feature in the current sorry state.
Hi Hraban, to be fair, I haven’t tested the improved ConTeXt-generated signature fields against MuPDF-GL and poppler, but not against Foxit Reader (I cannot recall any other PDF signing software). I have to investigate this further, since if “Acrobat Reader” recognizes (what I think it may be) another valid signature field structure, fixing the way we generate these fields will allow signatures from other programs to be recognized by “Acrobat”. Just in case it helps, Pablo ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
