> I could support name=yes and alike but I can't drop the
> \setupletter[list=...] because you need it to define your own  
> reference
> line with personalized elements, e.g. your working in a company
> a put a sign for the letter there plus the number of the office etc.

I'm sorry, didn't think of that. It makes sense, of course.


>> Another possibility would be removing the "backaddress=yes" switch
>> completely. Then if backaddress data is supplied it's printed along
>> with the line below and if not, well, then leave out the separator  
>> line.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Have you tried what will happen with a enabled backaddress and
> no value for backaddress, fromname and fromaddress are shown
> as backaddress but I don't rely on this feature and change it to
> waht you suggested.


I've just tried this quickly and this seems even better … then what  
about removing the option "backaddress=yes" from "\setupletterstyle"  
and provide a key "auto" for "backaddress" in "\setupletter"? Thus:

1. No backaddress line

\setupletter    
        [fromname={Arthur Thor},
         fromaddress={Hidden Street 2\\57895 Mysterytown}]

2. backaddress line generated from sender information

\setupletter    
        [fromname={Arthur Thor},
         fromaddress={Hidden Street 2\\57895 Mysterytown},
         backaddress=auto]

3. Custom backaddress

\setupletter    
        [fromname={Arthur Thor},
         fromaddress={Hidden Street 2\\57895 Mysterytown},
         backaddress={Thor Inc., Mystery Street 5, 59875 Hidden Town}]

Oliver
        
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to