On 08/28/2017 02:53 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 2017-08-28 um 10:37 schrieb luigi scarso <luigi.sca...@gmail.com>: > >> One of the reason to not include a color profile in the standard distribution >> is that it's an advanced topic, a field for an advanced user. >> It's quite easy to make pdf that looks ok, but are not ok for printing >> (wrong profile for the medium) >> or are invalid (it can happen if the pdf has an output intent with a >> profile A, and the document has a color with different profile B, >> perhaps in an image). >> On average the casual user will complain saying "ConTeXt makes wrong >> pdf", perhaps showing the result from a bugged validator >> (all already happen, in several situations). >> >> The context meeting is the best place to talk of all these issues. > > Ok, I’ll reserve a timeslot for PDF/(X/A/UA) discussion.
Unfortunately, I cannot attend the meeting. I’m not especially interesting in doing the thing myself, but I want to be able to use it. BTW, Luigi, not including the profiles doesn’t prevent people messing things, since they aren’t included and complaints had taken place. Of course, I would be very interested in the results from the discussions in the next meeting. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
