On Friday 21 January 2005 16:42, Mercer, Jeff wrote: > In my experience, while Ntop is a wicked cool tool, it's stability is > dependent on many factors, not just the OS.
This is for sure! > Until Ntop 3.1, I could rarely keep a runtime up for more than a day or so. > The biggest issue generally being resource utilization (i.e. memory). But > I'll say that 3.1 definitely seems SIGNIFICANTLY more stable for me than > any previous version. I did not see any significant stability improvement switching from 3.0 to 3.1, so maybe we have to look elsewhere... Do you think that our stability problem could be much more a hardware resources issue than a operating system one? Thanks. --Tony _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
