Add to that our Exchange will not handle more than 50 MB worth of storage
per person.

Jon

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This does not sound good as all but 2 clients have YEARS worth of
> information in their PST's.  My current PST is about 500+ MB at the moment
> with my calendar going back several years and going forward several months.
> Is there a way to import PST's into OST's?
>
> Jon
>
>   On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Gavin Wilby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > IME Outlook is quicker in the main too!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Fogarty, Richard R Mr CTR USA USASOC <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >  No, you're looking at one or the other.  Think of the OST as a good
> > > thing.  If the system goes down and nothing can be recovered, the users
> > > simply logs into a new system and they've lost very little (stuff that was
> > > stored on the bad system – nick names etc).  OST = Good in this case.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:22 AM
> > >
> > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > > *Subject:* Re: Exchanged cached mode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ah, well we are very much a culture of PST files here.  I know not
> > > best practice but for the Linux mail system it was required.  I would 
> > > guess
> > > then that I need to talk to the Exchange admin and find out the ground 
> > > rules
> > > I will be living under now.  Can OST and PST files live on the same
> > > system?  Be open at the same time?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mobile users (and even users within the office) should be using cached
> > > mode. When using cached mode, everything is stored in an OST file, rather
> > > than a PST file.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I would recommend moving mail to a separate PST file. A
> > > PST file exists in a single location, and if there's a failure (e.g.
> > > disk fails, or laptop gets stolen) then you lose the mail. When using 
> > > cached
> > > mode, everything (except offline edits) is stored on the Exchange server.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, 27 February 2008 10:36 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > >
> > > *Subject:* Re: Exchanged cached mode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you very concise and to the point and even understandable to
> > > me.  Then I would need to have all my mobile clients use cached mode if
> > > possible or make sure they move their mail to other folders in their 
> > > Outlook
> > > profile correct?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > If you do not have cached mode – then Outlook needs to be connected to
> > > Exchange to allow for the user to be able to view their mail, contacts 
> > > etc.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you use cached mode, then the user can work offline, disconnected
> > > from Exchange. Everything will sync when Outlook is reconnected to 
> > > Exchange.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, 27 February 2008 10:18 PM
> > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > > *Subject:* Exchanged cached mode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry for the very basic question here.  What is the difference
> > > between cached and un-cached mode in the client setting for Exchange?  I 
> > > am
> > > not the Exchange admin, you could not pay me enough to take on that extra
> > > work, but I do have to support the clients.  We are moving from a Linux
> > > POP/IMAP server to Exchange and all of my clients are currently set up to
> > > POP their mail.  I do have mobile clients that I already know will be an
> > > issue but I will start on that later.  At the moment I am looking at just
> > > getting this setup and understanding why somethings are certain ways and 
> > > not
> > > other ways.  I will discuss specific issues with the Exchange admin.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any guidance would help a lot.  Specific reading for non-Exchange
> > > aware people would be more help.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to