"Jim McAtee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/29/2008 06:51:07 PM:
> The first approach is done in DNS, which is pretty > straightforward. (BTW, > I'm not sure about best practices, but I've never liked using > 'www.subdomain.domain.com' host names. There's no reason to prepend the > www. except where it's expected at the topmost level. People > seldom type > in these sub-host names manually, so are unlikely to add a www.) Like them or not, I would still configure DNS to answer both ways (with and without) as many people type www automatically - for everything.... Eric Eskam =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The contents of this message are mine personally and do not reflect any position of the U.S. Government "The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange protein; it rejects it." - P. B. Medawar ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
