That's good to know. Fortunately this one is for a domain controller which will only have two raid 1 sets. No raid 5 needed for it. Thanks. Glen.
-----Original Message----- From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) [mailto:tom.alver...@ngc.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: HP RAID5 P400 SATA questions The E200/128 controller will not do RAID5 unless you add the 128MB BBWC upgrade. -----Original Message----- From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: HP RAID5 P400 SATA questions Two of the servers will have 2 x 72gig 15krpm sas 2.5inch raid 1 for os and 3 x 146gig 10krpm 2.5inch sas raid 5 for data. These are for MS-Hyper-v use. Exchange server will have 2 x 72gig 15krpm sas 2.5inch raid 1 for os, 2 x 146gig 10krpm 2.5 inch sas raid 1 for logs and 3 x 300gig 10krpm 2.5inch sas for exchange dbs. Last server is for a users home directories. It will have 2 x 72gig 15krpm raid 1 for OS, 6 x 300gig 10krpm 2.5inch sas raid 5 for data. The one other server may be even worse. It is for a domain controller, dhcp and dns. It has the E200/128 controller. Any bad news on that controller? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~