That's why we need minions!

 

-sc

 

From: Ralph Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 1:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing

 

Not really.  I am basically a 1 person IT department with 1 other person 
helping me with PC maintenance, for 200 users at 10 locations, so I have a long 
list of things I  want to /need to/ should do, but am very short on the time 
and resources I need to get it all done.  Especially since I am working at a 
non-profit.  (End of 'poor me' whining.)

 

I do think that sending out an 'all employees' email is viewed by most people 
as the fastest, most effective way to get an announcement or notification out 
to everyone. So I don't see that really diminishing much.  I do post some 
things, like the café menu, on a web page for employees to access, so there are 
some cases where teaching employees to send out a message that 'there is a new 
menu posted on the website' with a link would at least save the attachment from 
being mass distributed, but that wouldn't change the SIS ratio.

 

I think, after reading the messages in this thread as well as the MS article 
cited, the biggest behavior affecting the SIS ratio in my organization is 
people not cleaning messages out of their mailboxes.  We have people who keep 
everything for years.  Past efforts to use mailbox manager to delete messages 
over a certain age have been nixed by the CEO and the rest of the admin team.  
Time to fight that battle again, I guess. 

 

As usual, reading messages on this list is instructive.  Definitely the 
solution, as is often the case, better user training and providing better 
alternatives that they will readily accept.

 

Ralph

 

 

________________________________

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 12:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing

 

I was being (somewhat) facetious.

 

Menus? Do you guys do intranet?

 

-sc

 

From: Ralph Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 11:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing

 

There are some "all employees" messages sent out - for example the HR dept 
sends out a monthly newsletter now through email instead of distributing hard 
copy.  The cafeteria often sends out daily specials or menus to all employees.

We get a lot of messages sent from various state agencies that may go to twenty 
or thirty people within our agency, often with attachments.  There are a lot of 
people within our agency who are on the same external mailing lists, so there 
is probably some duplication there.  

 

Overall I don't think the "all employees" messages are that excessive - I se 
maybe 5 or 10 a week.

 

________________________________

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing

 

Good lord.

 

Do you guys simply email everything to the "all employees" DL instead of 
sending individual emails?

 

-sc

 

From: Ralph Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing

 

14.5 for 200 users.

 

________________________________

From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing

 

5.25 for roughly 350 users.

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David Mazzaccaro 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Mine is at 40.  (150 users, 1 E2003 store)
Never thought to look at this particular perfmon counter before this
post.
Id' be interested to see what others are reporting....



-----Original Message-----
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Amusing

I bet if you look at your SIS ratio perf counter you won't see anything
near a 10x reduction.


-sc

-----Original Message-----
From: John Hornbuckle <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Amusing

I'll have to ponder that one a bit. Not sure I like it. Disks may be
cheap, but eliminating SIS would cause storage requirements to increase
by an order of magnitude. The OP's situation is a prime example...
Suddenly a 9 MB storage requirement becomes 2.7 GB storage requirement
(if my math is right).







From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:10 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing

3000x9



Disks are cheap, Exchange 2010 is designed to run RAID-less on large
SATA (e.g. 1TB) drives. 1 database per SATA drive - TX logs & DB on the
same volume.





Thanks,

Brian Desmond

[email protected]

c - 312.731.3132



Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/
<http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/>

Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian
<https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian>



From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:57 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing

How does Ex 2010 work regarding SIS? If it doesn't use it, does it use
some similar technology? Or would the OP's 9 MB file now take 3000x9 MB
of space?







John Hornbuckle

MIS Department

Taylor County School District

318 North Clark Street

Perry, FL 32347



www.taylor.k12.fl.us <http://www.taylor.k12.fl.us/> 








~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

 

 

 

Confidentiality Notice:

******************

This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential 
information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not 
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and 
destroy all copies of the original message.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Confidentiality Notice:

******************

This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential 
information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not 
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and 
destroy all copies of the original message.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Confidentiality Notice:

******************

This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential 
information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not 
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and 
destroy all copies of the original message.

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to