No apologies needed. I certainly appreciate you sharing this information. Bad-timing is just part of the job, right?
- Sean On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Ziots, Edward <ezi...@lifespan.org> wrote: > Sorry man, better you know now, or deal with the fallout of issues with > high-end systems laters. I am dealing with the same stuff, to include SP > upgrades on multiple high end servers, > > > > Z > > > > Edward Ziots > > Network Engineer > > Lifespan Organization > > MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + > > ezi...@lifespan.org > > Phone:401-639-3505 > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:31 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: For those that use multipathing solutions with your servers > NON Paged memory pool leak > > > > I believe the only reason they (Dell) suggested downgrading is because our > EMC Support is provided by Dell. I think they're generally a few months > behind EMC, certifying new software releases, before recommending them for > upgrade. > > > > I just sent them new SP Collects for new analysis as well as directed them > to the KB article describing this issue. We'll see what Dell Professional > Services has to say about the matter. > > > > The timing really sucks as I just completed all of the other recommended > updates from the previous analysis. Now I have to go back and request an > additional outage window for 70+ critical systems. > > > > - Sean > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Christopher Bodnar < > christopher_bod...@glic.com> wrote: > > What was the reasoning by EMC to downgrade to 5.1 instead of upgrading to > 5.3? > > > > Chris > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
