Or BackupExec can now do this.  (Say it was purged from deleted items). 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:jmajorow...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail server software

Yes you do.  It's called Deleted Items Retention.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 1:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail server software

Yes, but you don't have any way to restore *just one message* with
NTBackup.
:-) Agree that I should have been a bit more specific... If you want to
be able to back up mailbox by mailbox, etc. you have to "pay to play"
with Exchange. Other email server software, no so much. :-)




-----Original Message-----
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail server software

Not to discount what you know about Exchange but...
1. I don't think any DB should be scanned by an AV program that doesn't
recognize it as such. Ninja is stellar at this.
2. I'm backing up my E2K7 DBs with the native windowsbackup, no extra
cost to me.

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell     (352) 215-6944
Fax     (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4


-----Original Message-----
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail server software

Exactly! That's one of my concerns... Antivirus has to be told to
overlook certain directories and you have to have an "exchange-aware"
antivirus or buy a special "plugin" for the antivirus to allow it to
scan the Exchange DB. AFAIK, most of the "alternatives" (at least Kerio)
doesn't have this restriction.

Not to mention having to buy special add-ons for your archiving solution
just to back up the email store. Oh, and while it's not a problem now,
up until the most recent version of Exchange, you couldn't have more
than one message store and if it got too big, it would virtually implode
from being so big.

On the reasons why I don't like Outlook, the 2 GB PST file size is a
biggie.
:-) Although the main reason they get that big is that idiots like to
send large files via email...and email is NOT a file transfer
application. :-)



-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 1:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mail server software

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Brian Desmond<br...@briandesmond.com>
wrote:
> What's the problem with the database engine? There's been a massive 
> amount of engineering work in that space - I don't expect it's going
anywhere.

  I can't speak for the OP... but the fact that the Exchange IS is a
giant binary blob, completely opaque for the most part, requiring
special tools to work with it, has always made me somewhat
uncomfortable.

  I worked with a Cyrus mail system once that was really sweet.  It
could handle many more users on much smaller hardware vs Exchange at the
time, and all the mail was still stored in plain text files (one per
message).  You could analyze the message store with the "more"
command if you had to.  I don't think we ever had to, but it was nice to
know you had the option.

  I like simple systems; they tend to be more robust.  Exchange has
always struck me as being more complex than it needed to be.  In
particular, Exchange is pretty fragile when you mistreat it.  There's
not much you can do to a Cryus mail server that will result in major
data loss; you can reconstruct from basics if you have to.  Exchange,
sheesh, in 2000, all you had to do was run a file search against the
"M: drive" and the server would implode.

  On my list of things to worry about, all this is pretty low down on my
list, but it's not my ideal situation.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.58/2309 - Release Date:
08/17/09 06:08:00

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health
Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are
prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal
and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this
information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.58/2309 - Release Date:
08/17/09 06:08:00

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to