Funny thing is I never use DEL.  Haven't since 6/15/2005. 113976 messages in
this folder as of now.  This and ActiveDir probably consumes 90% of my PST
size.
 
 
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
 
 
 

  _____  

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 10:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Good NT sysadmin list?



I wouldn't want this list to change one bit.  Sometimes I read the very OT
stuff, sometimes not.  We get to know each other on this list and most of us
have never seen or spoken to one another.

 

Truly, this thread is just more "noise" and the op is just adding to it by
starting the subject in the first place.

 

Sort by conversation and liberal use of DEL is all that is needed.

 

I find much value in this group and hope to see it continue to prosper.

 

From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 9:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Good NT sysadmin list?

 

This list has always had its noise, it's unavoidable. It definitely seems to
be higher during the Summer months when the traffic is low.

 

That being said, it's an invaluable resource.

 

Don Guyer

Systems Engineer - Information Services

Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group

431 W. Lancaster Avenue

Devon, PA 19333

Direct: (610) 993-3299

Fax: (610) 650-5306

don.gu...@prufoxroach.com

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 1:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Good NT sysadmin list?

 

I agree the noise here is far too high lately... But I don't delete the
messages (takes time) or use conversation view; is it that hard just to
ignore a thread, not read it, and move on?  Read what's important.  Most on
topic questions get answered quickly and thoroughly imo.

 

I think a little noise is needed to build a network and trust within the
contributors.  It gives my a good laugh too from time to time.  Stu always
seems to chime in at the right time to put things to a halt.

 

-Sam

 

  _____  

From: Christopher [mailto:c.bo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 8:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Good NT sysadmin list?

Yeah, thank goodness for Gmail's conversation sorting (it has its
moments..). 

Althought I totally agree with Ben, you have to admit that the signal itself
has been pretty low lately so it makes the noise seem a lot worse..

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Michael B. Smith
<mich...@owa.smithcons.com> wrote:

If it weren't for OWA 2010's conversation view, I would've had to drop out
awhile ago. Thankfully, the Exchange list isn't quite as noisy.

The only other "quality" forums I know of also have high-noise.

________________________________________
From: Ken Schaefer [...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 9:03 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Good NT sysadmin list?

Personally I don't really want to wade through 100 messages deleting 75 of
them. When you get 5-600 messages a day, pressing delete for 75% of them
isn't scalable.

I'm with Ben - can we either have less noise, or can someone recommend a
better list?

Cheers
Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray [mailto:rz...@qwest.net]
Sent: Friday, 28 August 2009 6:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Good NT sysadmin list?

I'd be worried more if that 25% actually took up 25% of my time. But the
delete key's a beautiful thing.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 3:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Good NT sysadmin list?

 Anyone here know of a good email list to discuss NT sysadmin issues?

 Seriously, folks, the signal-to-noise ratio on this list is going to hell.
Today we had 15 messages on the definition of a word (here's a
tip: www.google.com), 37 on a cartoon, 8 on banjos, 5 on the security of
Mac's, 7 that were basically bitching about lack of recognition in one's
job, 4 asking if the list was up (email asking if email was working?!?), and
1 get-well wish in a 3-day-old banned thread.  That's 77.  Oh, and about 20
that were actually something like on-topic.
That's a ratio of about 4:1, or 25%.

 Twenty five percent.  Ponder that a bit.  Would you work for 25% of your
pay?  Would you pass a student with a 25% grade average?

 I  think it's one thing to have the occasional off-topic message or thread,
or occasional joke.  This is something else entirely.  This is the
occasional on-topic message in a sea of crap.  I've seen Stu kill more
threads in the past 7 days than I've seen him do in the previous year.  Is
it too much to ask that people act like adults and exercise a little
self-discipline?

 Whatever happened to "on-topic and low noise"?

 I realize I've been a sometime contributor to some of this myself, and from
this point forward I'm going to strive not to be.  I ask that you please all
join me in that.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


  _____  

If this email is spam, report it here:
http://www.OnlyMyEmail.com/ReportSpam
<http://www.onlymyemail.com/view/?action=reportSpam&Id=ODEzNjQ6OTU0MjkzMTg4O
nBqcEBwc25ldC5jb20%3D>  
THIS ELECTRONIC MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
PROPERTY OF THE SENDER. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED FOR USE BY THE ADDRESSEE
ONLY. ANY OTHER INTERCEPTION, COPYING, ACCESSING, OR DISCLOSURE OF THIS
MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE
IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER AND DELETE THIS MAIL AND ALL ATTACHMENTS. DO
NOT FORWARD THIS MESSAGE WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE SENDER. 



THIS ELECTRONIC MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL
AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF THE SENDER. THE INFORMATION IS 
INTENDED FOR USE BY THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. ANY OTHER INTERCEPTION,
COPYING, ACCESSING, OR DISCLOSURE OF THIS MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED.
IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY
NOTIFY THE SENDER AND DELETE THIS MAIL AND ALL ATTACHMENTS. DO NOT
FORWARD THIS MESSAGE WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE SENDER. 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to