Yes I understand that now, actually understood it a long time ago to but
my brain must have thought it wasn't worth remembering.  Here's what I
find strange in my situation.  I've removed the un-necessary DNS and
Gateway address's on the ISCSI NIC.  Made sure the binding is set to the
correct NIC.  My DNS servers can resolve the problem server just fine.
My clients that use those DNS servers can't resolve the problem server.
So I start digging around and there's no Host A record on either of my
DC's for the problem server.  Well no wonder my clients have problems.
But how are my DC's able to resolve in the first place and why isn't
there a record?

________________________________

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 9:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: gateway metric question



It has nothing to do with virtual or Win2k8. It has everything to do
with understanding basic IP routing.

 

You should have one default gateway only. That's the whole point of a
*default* gateway -> everything that doesn't have a defined route
(either a subnet  local to an adapter, or a defined route to a specific
gateway) gets sent to the default gateway. Windows is just doing some
intelligent stuff in the background to attempt to hide this basic fact
from you.

 

The solution to your problem (on all Windows OSes):

a)      Single default gateway

b)      On all other adapters where you have subnets you need to reach
that are not link-local: define static route)

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] 
Sent: Monday, 1 March 2010 9:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: gateway metric question

 

You may be on to something there.  Although I don't know why this server
would want to be a pain about it.  I have one other server that does
have all the DNS and Gateway info in the ISCSI adapter settings and it's
been working fine for months.  Maybe because it's 2003 and physical and
the PITA one is 2008 and Virtual.

 

________________________________

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 1:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: gateway metric question

Sounds like a binding order issue to me. Make sure you don't have DNS or
WINS configured on the iSCSI NIC and that it's not configured to
register in DNS also. 

 

Thanks,

Brian Desmond

br...@briandesmond.com <mailto:br...@briandesmond.com> 

 

c - 312.731.3132

 

From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: gateway metric question

 

Yes they are on on the same segment and there's no need to route.  That
being said all my VLANS including the ISCSI VLANs are routable between
each other.  I have a few pc's on dissimilar VLANS that weren't able to
resolve the file server, when I added the gateway address to the ISCSI
NIC they could then resolve the server name on the LAN Side.

 

________________________________

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: gateway metric question

Are all the iSCSI nodes on the same broadcast segment?  If there's no
need to route to a different segment, then you don't need a gateway on
that NIC.  Where did you read that about iSCSI client connectivity
suffering without a gateway?  None of our iSCSI clients or targets have
gateways configured and I've never seen any issues because of it. 

 

Hope this helps,

RS

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:36 AM, N Parr <npar...@mortonind.com> wrote:

2008 server with a LAN pointing NIC and an ISCSI pointing NIC on
separate VLANS.  Windows give you an warning if you have a gateway
address set for both.  But from what I understand it's a bad thing as
far as client connectivity if you don't have the gateway entered on the
ISCSI NIC.  So should I bother setting a higher metric on the LAN facing
nic or just let windows figure it out?  The ISCSI connector is using
IP's and forced out over the ISCSI NIC so DNS doesn't come in to play
there.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to