I take it that was a joke answer... was wondering what Avenue Q was...

>>> Richard Stovall <rich...@gmail.com> 3/17/2010 11:28 AM >>>
LOL!

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Avenue Q.
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:23, Joseph Heaton <jhea...@dfg.ca.gov> wrote:
>> I agree John.  My big activities at home are playing MMOs, for the most 
>> part.  My Comcast connection at 6-12 Mb is just fine for that.  I'm not 
>> running a business out of my home or anything.
>>
>> What are people doing at home, for "personal" reasons, that would need 50 - 
>> 100 Mbps down, and 50ish Mbps up?
>>
>>>>> John Hornbuckle <john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> 3/17/2010 11:08 AM >>>
>> I feel like such a neoluddite... I get 10-15Mbps at home via cable modem, 
>> and honestly that's plenty fast for 99% of what I do.
>>
>>
>>
>> John Hornbuckle
>> MIS Department
>> Taylor County School District
>> www.taylor.k12.fl.us 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:54 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: RE: National broadband
>>
>> From what I gathered from this site, they just want to release the capping 
>> the ISP's do on the available bandwidth for the customers, not necessarily 
>> allow Internet for all citizens.  ISP's truly have a large amount of 
>> bandwidth available to consumers, yet to control pricing and overhead they 
>> cap speeds and gradually release them on an accounting-time-period-basis.
>>
>> I have AT&T at my home, and the highest Mbps down available is 24Mbps, but 
>> compared to a year ago, its twice as fast.  So it just happened to be 
>> available now instead of last year?
>>
>> If I were to pay $65/month for 100Mbps/50Mbps, I would gladly do it.  So 
>> long as it's available.  Knowing it's available yet being restricted is what 
>> is irritating.
>>
>>
>> Jay Dale
>> I.T. Manager, 3GiG
>> Mobile: 713.299.2541
>> Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com<mailto:kandy.luk...@3-gig.com>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may 
>> contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the 
>> intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>> notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and 
>> attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly 
>> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive 
>> information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply 
>> e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
>>
>>
>> From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:40 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: RE: National broadband
>>
>> I could run a cable up to you from our OC3... ;-)
>>
>> From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:jjohn...@hydraflowusa.com] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:51 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: RE: National broadband
>>
>> Though I would love to see the US and all broadband providers give us better 
>> services, my concern is at what cost?
>>
>> If I look at my home service, 24 Mbps down and 1.5 up, is running $65.  That 
>> is pretty cheap, but still a LONG way from 100/50 Mbps.  I am really curious 
>> what the government feels is "affordable access"?  It would seem that only 
>> businesses would pay more than $100/month for service, but a business would 
>> require some type of SLA.  At my office, I COULD get 100 Mbps service, but 
>> have no idea what the price would be.  Considering 3 Mbps service is costing 
>> me $530 for a business line, I would not even want to consider the price.
>>
>>
>> Jeff Johnson
>> Systems Administrator
>> 714-773-2600 Office
>> 714-773-6351 Fax
>> [cid:image001.jpg@01CAC5DB.5FEFEF30] 
>>
>> From: David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:39 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: National broadband
>>
>> Thoughts, comments?
>>
>> http://www.broadband.gov/ 
>> David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
>> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
>> (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications 
>> to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the 
>> public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to 
>> public disclosure.
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to