Possibly NSFW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-TA57L0kuc
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:37, Joseph Heaton <jhea...@dfg.ca.gov> wrote: > I take it that was a joke answer... was wondering what Avenue Q was... > >>>> Richard Stovall <rich...@gmail.com> 3/17/2010 11:28 AM >>> > LOL! > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Avenue Q. >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:23, Joseph Heaton <jhea...@dfg.ca.gov> wrote: >>> I agree John. My big activities at home are playing MMOs, for the most >>> part. My Comcast connection at 6-12 Mb is just fine for that. I'm not >>> running a business out of my home or anything. >>> >>> What are people doing at home, for "personal" reasons, that would need 50 - >>> 100 Mbps down, and 50ish Mbps up? >>> >>>>>> John Hornbuckle <john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> 3/17/2010 11:08 AM >>> >>> I feel like such a neoluddite... I get 10-15Mbps at home via cable modem, >>> and honestly that's plenty fast for 99% of what I do. >>> >>> >>> >>> John Hornbuckle >>> MIS Department >>> Taylor County School District >>> www.taylor.k12.fl.us >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:54 PM >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >>> Subject: RE: National broadband >>> >>> From what I gathered from this site, they just want to release the capping >>> the ISP's do on the available bandwidth for the customers, not necessarily >>> allow Internet for all citizens. ISP's truly have a large amount of >>> bandwidth available to consumers, yet to control pricing and overhead they >>> cap speeds and gradually release them on an accounting-time-period-basis. >>> >>> I have AT&T at my home, and the highest Mbps down available is 24Mbps, but >>> compared to a year ago, its twice as fast. So it just happened to be >>> available now instead of last year? >>> >>> If I were to pay $65/month for 100Mbps/50Mbps, I would gladly do it. So >>> long as it's available. Knowing it's available yet being restricted is >>> what is irritating. >>> >>> >>> Jay Dale >>> I.T. Manager, 3GiG >>> Mobile: 713.299.2541 >>> Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com<mailto:kandy.luk...@3-gig.com> >>> >>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may >>> contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the >>> intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby >>> notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and >>> attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly >>> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive >>> information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply >>> e-mail and delete all copies of this message. >>> >>> >>> From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:40 AM >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >>> Subject: RE: National broadband >>> >>> I could run a cable up to you from our OC3... ;-) >>> >>> From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:jjohn...@hydraflowusa.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:51 AM >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >>> Subject: RE: National broadband >>> >>> Though I would love to see the US and all broadband providers give us >>> better services, my concern is at what cost? >>> >>> If I look at my home service, 24 Mbps down and 1.5 up, is running $65. >>> That is pretty cheap, but still a LONG way from 100/50 Mbps. I am really >>> curious what the government feels is "affordable access"? It would seem >>> that only businesses would pay more than $100/month for service, but a >>> business would require some type of SLA. At my office, I COULD get 100 >>> Mbps service, but have no idea what the price would be. Considering 3 Mbps >>> service is costing me $530 for a business line, I would not even want to >>> consider the price. >>> >>> >>> Jeff Johnson >>> Systems Administrator >>> 714-773-2600 Office >>> 714-773-6351 Fax >>> [cid:image001.jpg@01CAC5DB.5FEFEF30] >>> >>> From: David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org] >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:39 AM >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >>> Subject: National broadband >>> >>> Thoughts, comments? >>> >>> http://www.broadband.gov/ >>> David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER >>> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION >>> (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications >>> to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the >>> public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to >>> public disclosure. >>> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >>> >>> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >>> >>> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
