I've just got to disagree with one comment, "...less disruptive then a
phone call..." The person receiving a phone call, an IM or email, not to
mention a tweet is ALWAYS distracted. One thing we've done is put a Do
Not Disturb button on our phones, so you know if a person is busy and
doesn't want to be disturbed. The phone doesn't ring, just goes directly
into voice mail. Getting back to social networking, the real problem is
the fact that there doesn't seem to be a way to block non-business
tweets. It's just another distraction, like IM and email from friends
and family.
 

Murray

 

________________________________

From: Steven Peck [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Internet Policies


IM isn't just chat.  Especially if you have OCS installed.

There are tons of things that can be dispensed with a quick 2-3 line IM
session that would require waiting and delays for other things.  With IM
you can see if a user if actually present and can be contacted now.
It's faster then email for yes/no questions and is less disruptive then
a phone call.  If I see a user status as 'Busy' then I don't bug them,
but if they are listed as 'Available' then I can ping them on quick
short questions.  

During phone conferences having the ability to contact people not on the
line, (outage, check with engineers working the issue) to then relay
information to the call is invaluable.  Our help desk uses it.  Our help
desk is scattered over 4 physical locations and if there is a major
issue, then they can't call the other locations because everyone is on
the phone.  Late night troubleshooting sessions from home that don't
need a call means my boss isn't calling for status, he just checks me on
IM.  My wife and kids do not get woken up.  It is often easier to
arrange lunch, etc through IM rather then email.  In a tightly
controlled messaging environment it means less clutter in the archives.


Once people actually start using IM for business reasons it's seriously
addictive and helps substantially but it's one of those 'you have to
experience it to understand it' type of things.

Out of all the enabled IM accounts we have 3/4 signed on during business
hours which is a huge buy in for us.  We do not mandate people use it,
merely make it available as a service.

Steven Peck





On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Murray Freeman <[email protected]>
wrote:


        Well, as long as we're discussing IM, we don't allow it
currently. But, I have trouble understanding how IM is better than
either email or a meeting, or using a telephone to accomplish the very
same thing as an IM. Can someone explain that to me. Oh, we've recently
adopted social networking for our organization, but primarily for our
membership. I'm having trouble understanding how social networking will
help our members too!
         

        Murray

         

________________________________

        From: Steve Ens [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:42 AM 

        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: Re: Internet Policies
        

        It all depends if there is a business or productivity reason for
it.  We use IM in some of the departments for meetings, quick
conversations, etc.  But if it is used for wasting time, I would not
allow it.
        
        
        On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:38 AM, John Aldrich <
[email protected]> wrote:
        

                What restrictions, if any, do your organizations place
on things like IM or social networking sites? I sent out a warning to
the office personnel this morning regarding the new "IM Virus" and got
an email back from the CEO basically stating "shouldn't that be a
violation of company policy anyway?" and I had to tell him, I knew of no
policies regarding that; and that in fact, my former supervisor was
fully aware of at least one person (who's child is overseas in the
military) who used IM on a semi-regular basis.

                For this reason, I'm working on coming up with a company
policy. I've looked at the sample template from SANS as well as another
one that someone sent me off-list. I'm planning on incorporating the
best of everything I get, so if anyone has any suggested language
regarding IM or social networking, please let me have it. J

                 

                  

                 

                 

                

                 

                

                


         

        

         

        

         

        

         


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to