I have 2wire too...those things are great.

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Murray Freeman <mfree...@alanet.org> wrote:

> Of the dozen or so wifi's that I can see with inssider, one is WEP, my
> neighbor behind me is WPA2 and everyone else is WPA. Every now and then I
> see an unencrypted wifi, and I suspect it's a "honeypot". I'm WPA2! Most of
> the neighbors have "2wire" names, and I've been told that those are AT&T
> Uverse users.
>
>
> Murray
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 2:59 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: script SSID for wireless configs
>
> If drive by intruders see either WPA or WPA2 they will most likely keep
> going.
>
> If they see WEP they might stick around after the 30 seconds it takes to
> crack it, and if it's open then they're golden.
>
> I'd be more worried about the 13-year old neighbor boy who is running Linux
> brute-forcing your network than someone outside of your neighborhood.
>
> That "unkown" SSID is more tempting than not.
>
> I use my street address as my SSID, FWIW.
>
> Kurt
>
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:47, Murray Freeman <mfree...@alanet.org> wrote:
> > Thanks Micheal, that clears it up somewhat. It sounds to me that with
> > the number of wifi's in my neighborhood, I don't have to be very
> > concerned because the rest of the neighborhood are broadcasting and
> > several use their family name. I'm going to assume that they would
> > tend to draw the hackers more than my "unknown" wifi, and most of them
> are WPA whereas I'm WPA2.
> >
> > Thanks again.
> >
> >
> > Murray
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 2:34 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: script SSID for wireless configs
> >
> > Technically speaking, its not that it isnt "broadcasted".  It's not
> > "advertised" in the packets.  This is a good short summary:
> >
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_set_%28802.11_network%29#Security
> > _of_Broadcasting_SSID
> >
> > --
> > ME2
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Murray Freeman <mfree...@alanet.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> So you are telling me that there are tools that can see something
> >> that isn't being broadcast? I'm having trouble with that concept. If
> >> I tturn off the power altogether, can these"tools" see my wifi? If
> >> the broadcast is shut off, how is it broadcasting? Finally, if these
> >> tools can see my SSID, can they also see the unencrypted password? I
> >> can tell you that Inssider tells me a lot about the wifi's it picks
> >> up including it's mac address along with the manufacturer of the
> >> wifi, and the channel in use. But my SSID displays as unknown. Either
> wifi is completely unsecure or it isn't. Please explain!
> >>
> >>
> >> Murray
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:23 PM
> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
> >> Subject: Re: script SSID for wireless configs
> >>
> >> Its false security.  Mainly because anyone capable of hacking your
> >> network can see your SSID with their toolset (its still out there in the
> ether).
> >>
> >> Obscurity != Security
> >>
> >> And with that, let the soapboxing begin...
> >>
> >> --
> >> ME2
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Murray Freeman
> >> <mfree...@alanet.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've been "lurking" on this topic, and I have a couple of questions.
> >>> First, I have a wifi at home and I have the radio broadcast turned
> >>> off. I'm using INSSIDER software to look around my neighborhood from
> >>> time to time. My SSID shows up as "unknown". Obviously I have no
> >>> problem connecting and if someone who has never connected previously
> >>> comes over, I help them by telling them the SSID and password to
> >>> connect. The next time they come over, they connect automatically.
> >>> So, my questions. First, even if you know my SSID, you need to know
> >>> my password or you're not going to connect. I figure that without the
> SSID, it is even more difficult for a stranger to connect.
> >>> Oh, I'm using WPA2 security. I know I could use MAC filtering, but
> >>> I'm comfortable that I'm secure enough. Can you guys explain to me
> >>> how having the radio broadcast turned off makes the security lessened?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Murray
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 12:01 PM
> >>> To: NT System Admin Issues
> >>> Subject: RE: script SSID for wireless configs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> No real input as their decisions are already made, but like I said,
> >>> they are depending solely on non-broadcast of the SSID as their
> >>> 'security', they do have other proper measures in place.
> >>>
> >>> Erik Goldoff
> >>>
> >>> IT  Consultant
> >>>
> >>> Systems, Networks, & Security
> >>>
> >>> '  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
> >>>
> >>> From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 11:55 AM
> >>> To: NT System Admin Issues
> >>> Subject: RE: script SSID for wireless configs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The post was offered as a general comment, not a response to your
> >>> question.  That happens around here a lot.  As IT consultant, do you
> >>> not have any capacity to advise the agency on security matters?  Or
> >>> keep them from shooting themselves in the foot?  I guess not...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Carl
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 11:50 AM
> >>> To: NT System Admin Issues
> >>> Subject: RE: script SSID for wireless configs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you but that was not the question.  To the agency, this is one
> >>> layer of security, in addition to WPA, etc.  The question is whether
> >>> the wireless config could be scripted.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Erik Goldoff
> >>>
> >>> IT  Consultant
> >>>
> >>> Systems, Networks, & Security
> >>>
> >>> '  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to