Wouldn't it be funny if Bing went to a white sceeen? On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Richard Stovall <rich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good point. That would have to be a negative. (Unless of course people > try Bing, don't like it, and go straight back to Google...) > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Rod Trent <rodtr...@myitforum.com> wrote: > >> At the same time – headline buzz around the industry is comparing Google >> to Bing, which also markets Bing… >> >> >> >> *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:39 PM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* Re: Google and stupid background pictures >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:41 PM, David Mazzaccaro < >> david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com> wrote: >> >> I think that was the market test (which they failed)! >> >> LOL >> >> >> >> I'm not so sure that's true. Like many others, I hated it when I first >> saw it, and I still do. What you have to admit, however, is that every >> single Google user in the universe now knows that he or she can add a >> customized background image to the default Google search page. Annoying the >> bejeezus out of a lot of us for a few hours allowed them to gain near 100% >> knowledge of a new feature, and I doubt they'll lose any customers because >> of it. Conversely, they may gain some new ones b/c you have to have a >> Google account to use the feature. >> >> >> >> Just a thought. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
