and it went to the list !
________________________________ From: nuke-users-boun...@support.thefoundry.co.uk <nuke-users-boun...@support.thefoundry.co.uk> on behalf of Tahl <tahlni...@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 18 October 2016 12:01:02 AM To: Nuke user discussion Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Input Process not concatenating Replying offlist. typical. I am on a PC and dont have nuke installed. Order of operation should be Image->CDL->display LUT. So unless there is something in the CDL that is restricting the data being passed to the display, I would say the issue is caused by the display buffer and what is being passed to that what is your viewer bit depth set to ? Operationally Nuke wont concatenate any colour ops, only transforms. However it does sound like you might be applying the second operation to a display buffer with reduced colour depth ?! So Nuke might actually be rendering the Data to an 8bit buffer as part of the INPUT_PROCESS then applying the vLUT on top ? ________________________________ From: nuke-users-boun...@support.thefoundry.co.uk <nuke-users-boun...@support.thefoundry.co.uk> on behalf of Michael Garrett <michaeld...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 17 October 2016 10:33:36 PM To: Nuke user discussion Subject: [Nuke-users] Input Process not concatenating Not sure if this is common knowledge, but I'm guessing that it is: I was looking into a workflow where I set the shot CDL as an input process, with the show lut as a viewer process on top of that. Unfortunately, the input process and viewer process do not concatenate. I end up with milky blacks and flattened highlights. So at this stage, it looks like I will only burn the CDL into the dailies (sRGB, jpeg sequence and h.264) as I can burn in the CDL and the show lut without concatenation issues and all appears as it should. It would just be handy if the comp artist had the ability to enable/disable the input process underneath the show lut, to see the effect of the CDL. If anyone has any suggestions for how they do this, I'd be interested. Or, maybe this is actually a bug, not a limitation? I'm on 10.0v4 Linux. Thanks, Michael
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users