Hi Eric, On May 23, 2018 13:25:44 Eric Firing <efir...@hawaii.edu> wrote:
On 2018/05/23 9:06 AM, Matti Picus wrote: I understand at least some of the motivation and potential advantages, but as it stands, I find this NEP highly alarming.
I am not at my computer right now, so I will respond in more detail later. But I wanted to address your statement above:
I see a NEP as an opportunity to discuss and flesh out an idea, and I certainly hope that you there's no reason for alarm.
I do not expect to know whether this is a good idea before discussions conclude, so I appreciate your feedback. If we cannot find good support for the idea, with very specific benefits, it should simply be dropped.
But, I think there's a lot to learn from the conversation in the meantime w.r.t. exactly how streamlined people want NumPy to be, how core functionality can perhaps be strengthened by becoming a customer of our own API, how to optimally maintain sub-components, etc.
Best regards, Stéfan _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
