On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think a legalistic focus on the letter rather than the spirit of the > code of conduct is not that helpful (and probably what makes if feel US > centric - funny how court systems end up shaping countries). > > My preference would be to keep exactly the scipy version, so that at least > for these two highly related project there is just one code of conduct. But > for what it is worth, it does seem to me political views belongs on the > list - certainly as likely to give problems historically as for any of the > others on the list. > +1 to all of that. If as a result of this discussion we'd want to amend the CoC, let's do that to the SciPy version first (or as well) to keep things in sync. Cheers, Ralf > If we do end up with a different version, I'd prefer a really short one, > like just stating the golden rule (treat others as one would like to be > treated oneself). > > -- Marten > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
