On August 3, 2018 09:50:38 Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:01 PM Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
<looks back> Nope, concision is definitely not my strength. But I hope I
made the argument clear, at least.
No, wait. I got it:
Bad actors use "diversity of political beliefs" in bad faith as cover for
undermining the goals of the diversity statement. Marginalized groups want
more assurance that our community (1) isn't one of those bad actors and (2)
is willing and capable of resisting those bad actors when they come.
That's a very useful summary; thank you.
I think we can fairly easily add a sentence that encourages participation
from a wide diversity of people, while making it clear that including
someone in the conversation does not give them free reigns in contradiction
with the rest of the guidelines.
Ralf, if you agree, shall we do this for SciPy, and use the new version for
NumPy too?
Best regards,
Stéfan
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
