On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 11:02 +0300, Matti Picus wrote: > We currently have highest, high, normal, low, and lowest priority > labels > for github issues/PRs. At the recent status meeting, we proposed > consolidating these to a single "high" priority label. Anything > "low" > priority should be merged or closed since it will be quickly > forgotten, > and no "normal" tag is needed. > > > With that, we (the BIDS team) would like to encourage reviewers to > use > the "high" priority tag to indicate things we should be working on. > > Any objections or thoughts? >
Sounds like a plan, especially having practically meaningless tags right now is no help. Most of them are historical and personally I have only been using the milestones to tag things as high priority (very occasionally). - Sebastian > > Matti (in the names of Tyler and Stefan) > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
